Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 8:23:39 GMT 2
I feel affection for the progressive government that has been installed in Moncloa for a couple of years now, but between inaugurations, pandemics and territorial fire extinguishers, the progressive imprint has not been very clear. There have been so many things to untangle that the signs that there is a government with social sensitivity here are not clearly distinguished from other pragmatic proposals. But something is changing, it seems that suddenly the spigot has been opened through which the impositions that the beneficiaries have imposed on all of us throughout history must be deflated. The treatment of justice is an example; Although it does not seem to me that the determining factor is who and how the bodies of the judicial career are chosen, although this is important, it is secondary to the underlying progressive treatment: how one accesses the judicial career. I am talking about the way in which the parliamentary majority that supports the government has decided to face the issue of justice to denounce that it is always the offspring of the judicial class who access the positions where this power of the state is deployed.
Progressive majority has put on the table the need to open the judicial career so that it is representative of the social evolution that happens beyond the courts, beyond the robes earned by proximity. It was and is a clamor that the judicial career is even more endogamous than the university career, and that is how we are doing in terms of scientific advances and universal Australia Phone Number justice. Proper and mine is a cancer for evolution, as Darwin points out in his theory of evolution and Augustus Caesar in his modifications to the composition of the Roman courts. So for the good of all, let's welcome with a healthy "it's about time" what, at least I, consider the first progressive initiative that addresses the question of social hierarchy in an establishment that orbits at its free will, regardless of majorities. parliamentary, removed from social evolution and aloof from what judicial institutions external to their local domain recommend. Now it remains to be seen how this is substantiated, how it is articulated, who controls the deactivation of the conventional model of access and performance of the judicial career. And is it done? Well no my friend. The progressive majority does very well in fighting the battle for justice, it is critical if you ask me because of the impact that its existence has, but this is not the only expired fish.
Most progress must address the unmasking of other elitist rots embedded in God's way of living. I point out one that seems to me to be as crucial as that of the renewal of the CGPJ, I am referring to the review of the selection model for company managers and of the academics and politicians who applaud outdated forms of economic thought. CEOs and aides in thinktanks and foundations seem to be unaware that a fundamental mutation has occurred in the orientation of the macroeconomy that affects the daily lives of companies and conglomerates, in addition to the strategies in government or opposition economic policies. Pro-market rationality subsides, the zombie ideas that Nobel Prize winner Krugman says are in retreat, a fact confirmed at the Jackson Hole bankers' meeting. It opens the way to a new interpretation of the relationships between work, capital, the governance of their relationships and the perimeter and institutional control of international trade. The decisive fact is the transfer of prominence from the market to the state. The market has unleashed a set of problems that are summarized in the increase in inequalities and social destructuring that it is incapable of addressing. Only the state seems empowered to correct these imbalances. But most of the managers and their acolytes are unaware of this.
Progressive majority has put on the table the need to open the judicial career so that it is representative of the social evolution that happens beyond the courts, beyond the robes earned by proximity. It was and is a clamor that the judicial career is even more endogamous than the university career, and that is how we are doing in terms of scientific advances and universal Australia Phone Number justice. Proper and mine is a cancer for evolution, as Darwin points out in his theory of evolution and Augustus Caesar in his modifications to the composition of the Roman courts. So for the good of all, let's welcome with a healthy "it's about time" what, at least I, consider the first progressive initiative that addresses the question of social hierarchy in an establishment that orbits at its free will, regardless of majorities. parliamentary, removed from social evolution and aloof from what judicial institutions external to their local domain recommend. Now it remains to be seen how this is substantiated, how it is articulated, who controls the deactivation of the conventional model of access and performance of the judicial career. And is it done? Well no my friend. The progressive majority does very well in fighting the battle for justice, it is critical if you ask me because of the impact that its existence has, but this is not the only expired fish.
Most progress must address the unmasking of other elitist rots embedded in God's way of living. I point out one that seems to me to be as crucial as that of the renewal of the CGPJ, I am referring to the review of the selection model for company managers and of the academics and politicians who applaud outdated forms of economic thought. CEOs and aides in thinktanks and foundations seem to be unaware that a fundamental mutation has occurred in the orientation of the macroeconomy that affects the daily lives of companies and conglomerates, in addition to the strategies in government or opposition economic policies. Pro-market rationality subsides, the zombie ideas that Nobel Prize winner Krugman says are in retreat, a fact confirmed at the Jackson Hole bankers' meeting. It opens the way to a new interpretation of the relationships between work, capital, the governance of their relationships and the perimeter and institutional control of international trade. The decisive fact is the transfer of prominence from the market to the state. The market has unleashed a set of problems that are summarized in the increase in inequalities and social destructuring that it is incapable of addressing. Only the state seems empowered to correct these imbalances. But most of the managers and their acolytes are unaware of this.